The correct answer from each drop-down menu are the following ones:
The article "The Melting Arctic" attempst to win over public opinion by making use of persuasive techniques. One such technique is the use of <u>scientific data ,</u> which relies on proofs, graphs, and charts. The article also relies on <u>expert opinion,</u> which involves the endorsement of an idea or opinion by a renowned professional in that particular field.
In contrast, the NOAA video uses visuals of animals to appeal to the viewer's <u>emotions.</u> It makes <u>passionate</u> claims about the worsening Arctic conditions and the adverse effects they have on animal life.
The linking word "in contrast" indicates that what is about to be introduced should be the opposite to whas has been said. Consequently, as the first paragraph talks about scientific data, the second one should appeal to the opposite of that, that is, emotions and beliefs. "Passionate" is the only adjective in the examples that has a positive connotation that can be put together with the first option ("emotions").
Definitely the first one. The movie wasn’t great, but worth the watch.
Hey there Carlos!
Let's examine this above.
<span>Jeremy will be planting tulips in the spring.
let's take some key point's from this.
</span><span>Jeremy (will) be (planting) tulips in the spring.
The word's "will" and also "planting" are a form of the future tense.
So, in this case, we can cross out both option (c) and also (d).
Option (c) and also (d) are (present), and the sentence is not present, it would be in the future.
So, now we have both option (a) and also (b) as our last options.
This would be considered a "future perfect progressive" because the sentence shows that "he will plant tulips", which shows that this would be a future perfect goal pretty much.
Hope this helps you Carlos, and if you need any more help, never hesitate to ask more question's on Brainly
~Jurgen</span>
