Question

50 points+brainliest

Answer 1

Answer:

Step 1: Copy and paste an analytical claim in the box below. Identify the type of claim being made (facts/definition, cause, and effect, value, or solution). Then, revise the statement to make it work better as a specific type of claim.

Electrical cars are an effective strategy to pollute the environment less.

Step 2: What are the two sides of the argument involved in your claim, and which do you support? Revise the latest version of your thesis statement (the one you from the end of Step 1) so that it becomes clearer which side of the argument your claim expresses or explains.

One side of the argument is people that think that switching is a great idea and will make a change. The other side is people who maybe don’t want to change or people that don’t think switching will change anything.

New thesis statement: Electrical cars are an effective strategy to pollute the environment less. I support this idea.

Step 3: How can you make your thesis statement more precise? Is it narrow enough? Can you add more specific information to it? Revise the latest version of your thesis statement to make It more precise or specific.

New thesis statement: Electrical cars are an effective strategy to pollute the environment less.. I support this idea and maybe after time, we will see a difference in our air.

Step 4: What type of sentence is your thesis statement? Is that the best type for what you want to say? Identify your claim’s clauses and phrases and look for ways that you might modify the sentence structure to make the statement more clear and precise. Revise the latest version of your thesis statement in the space below, rearranging or revising its parts to make it stronger.

My final thesis statement: Electrical vehicles are a powerful procedure to contaminate the climate less. I support this thought and perhaps after time, we will see a distinction in our air and there will be less contamination.

Explanation:

The letters in bold are the answers to the questions.

Answer 2

Answer:

The Toulmin Method is a formula that allows writers to build a sturdy logical foundation for their arguments. First proposed by author Stephen Toulmin in The Uses of Argument (1958), the Toulmin Method emphasizes building a thorough support structure for each of an argument's key claims.

The basic format for the Toulmin Method is as follows:

Claim: In this section, you explain your overall thesis on the subject. In other words, you make your main argument.

Data (Grounds): You should use evidence to support the claim. In other words, provide the reader with facts that prove your argument is strong.

Warrant (Bridge): In this section, you explain why or how your data supports the claim. As a result, the underlying assumption that you build your argument on is grounded in reason.

Backing (Foundation): Here, you provide any additional logic or reasoning that may be necessary to support the warrant.

Counterclaim: You should anticipate a counterclaim that negates the main points in your argument. Don't avoid arguments that oppose your own. Instead, become familiar with the opposing perspective. If you respond to counterclaims, you appear unbiased (and, therefore, you earn the respect of your readers). You may even want to include several counterclaims to show that you have thoroughly researched the topic.

Rebuttal: In this section, you incorporate your own evidence that disagrees with the counterclaim. It is essential to include a thorough warrant or bridge to strengthen your essay’s argument. If you present data to your audience without explaining how it supports your thesis, your readers may not make a connection between the two, or they may draw different conclusions.

EXAMPLE OF THE TOULMIN METHOD:

Claim: Hybrid cars are an effective strategy to fight pollution.

Data1: Driving a private car is a typical citizen's most air-polluting activity.

Warrant 1: Due to the fact that cars are the largest source of private (as opposed to industrial) air pollution, switching to hybrid cars should have an impact on fighting pollution.

Data 2: Each vehicle produced is going to stay on the road for roughly 12 to 15 years.

Warrant 2: Cars generally have a long lifespan, meaning that the decision to switch to a hybrid car will make a long-term impact on pollution levels.

Data 3: Hybrid cars combine a gasoline engine with a battery-powered electric motor.

Warrant 3: The combination of these technologies produces less pollution.

Counterclaim: Instead of focusing on cars, which still encourages an inefficient culture of driving even as it cuts down on pollution, the nation should focus on building and encouraging the use of mass transit systems.

Rebuttal: While mass transit is an idea that should be encouraged, it is not feasible in many rural and suburban areas, or for people who must commute to work. Thus, hybrid cars are a better solution for much of the nation's population.