Are maps useful primary sources? Why or why not?

History

2 answers:

IRINA_888 [86]2 years ago

6 0

Answer:HOPE IT HELPS :)

Explanation: If a map was produced as immediate evidence of an area, then it is a primary source. If the map is just a symbolic depiction of a space then it is a secondary source. ... To illustrate further, the map below can be used as a primary source in a study about the development of telegraph lines between 1791 and 1872.

Kruka [31]2 years ago

4 0

Maps are useful primary sources. They show details of time and the place and can help understand how things can change over time.

You might be interested in

Who held power in the 1700s

Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:

During the 1700s, England was governed under a mixed constitution, made up of the monarch, the House of Lords and the House of Commons.

4 0

2 years ago

Why did a lot of people died in Maoist China

Virty [35]

45 million people were worked, starved, or beaten to death in China over a period of 4 years.

4 0

3 years ago

Which physical characteristic of Louisiana gave European's access to the interior of North America?

babymother [125]

Answer:

The rivers

Explanation:

The rivers gave the europeans the ability to go into North Americia.

7 0

3 years ago

Where did the Bataan Death March take place?

Nikitich [7]

The Philippines. I know why cause I had a quiz on dis.

6 0

2 years ago

A Prime Minister differs from a President in which of the following ways? Select all that apply.

fenix001 [56]

I would say B) and D) apply to some of the differences between a Prime Minister and a President and also A). In addition, a Prime Minister is head of the government but may not be head of the state which may be a President in the same country or perhaps a Governor General.

5 0

3 years ago