In the South, the governments resisted giving full ownership of land to freed slaves. Many blacks had to become sharecroppers on the plantations where they <span>had previously been slaves.
For labor, </span>the Radical Republicans attempted to put a land reform through Congress, promising, 40 acres and a mule, to newly-freed blacks in the South, which was rejected by moderate elements as socialistic. This <span>failure left blacks without an economic base and was one of the key </span><span>contributing factors to the development of sharecropping and segregation pay.</span>
Republicans took control of Congress.
It was the last battle that led to the end of the American Revolution :)
Hey there! I'm happy to help!
Let's look for answers that have to do with technology.
Smaller nations becoming part of larger empires is not really related to new technology, so this answer is not right.
Technology would not have allowed a smaller number of refugees during the war because the main thing that would have allowed a smaller number is more peaceful countries and places to take refuge, not necessarily new technology.
A slowdown in transportation improvements does not make much sense because if technology was improving it should have been easier to improve this.
New technology could have allowed for more military casualties because new and more destructive weapons such as machine guns, flamethrowers, tanks, etc. that would have caused many more people to perish.
Therefore, the answer is 3) increased military causalities in battles fought during the war.
Have a wonderful day!
1. They became better educated.
2. They took jobs writing books.
3. They learned about freedom.