Answer:
because japan bombed pearl harbor and sunk the lusitania forcing us to go to war
Explanation:
Answer:
hope you like it
Explanation:
This was a big deal because it introduced the concepts of limited government, rule of law, and due process. It also helped create the nation's Parliament (kind of like Congress in the U.S.). The Magna Carta was a government document that limited the power of the king of England and protected the rights of the nobility.
Inspiration for the U.S. Government
Many political theorists, documents, concepts, and institutions influenced the U.S. Declaration of Independence and Constitution in their assertion of natural individual rights and grounding of political authority in the consent of the governed.
Answer:
The question in the picture is actually very simple to answer because most of human history has been characterized by the fight of different groups of people over a territory. Land was until very recently, the most important economic resource because the economy of the world was based on agriculture, and this is why different groups of people fought so fiercely throughout history over it.
One example where the invasions of Germanic Peoples all over the Western Roman Empire during the Late Antiquity. These invasions resulted from the conflict between two different groups of people: the Germanic Peoples and the Romans, over a common territory: the lands of Western Europe.
The Germanic Peoples were victorious because they caused the fall of the Western Roman Empire, and replaced the Roman political order and rule with their own.
The question refers to the case Gibbons v. Ogden, a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. The case dealt with the power to regulate interstate commerce.
<u>Because Aaron Ogden had a state license in New York, he believed that steamboat operators without a license needed to stay out of New York waters.</u> Gibbons, however, believed he also had the right to navigate these waters as Cogress had began to regulate commerce in coastal areas. The Supreme Court sided with Gibbons, as they believed this to be a case not only of state trade but of the country's economic well-being.
