1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mariulka [41]
2 years ago
13

‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌

History
1 answer:
Svet_ta [14]2 years ago
7 0
<h2><em>Answer:where is your question ? </em></h2><h2><em>hope its helps you have a great day keep smiling be happy stay safe. </em></h2>

You might be interested in
Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia. Explain how this led to the conflict becoming the Great War.​
Vsevolod [243]

Answer:

When Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia, it led to Russia declaring war on Austria-Hungary as well because Russia was in an alliance with Serbia.

Germany which had an alliance with Austria-Hungary via the Triple Alliance then declared war on Russia.

Russia was already in an alliance with Great Britain and France known as the Triple Entente and when Germany declared war on Russia, Great Britain and France declared war on Germany.

Thus began the Great War.

6 0
3 years ago
Please helpppp ASAP!!!!
Alla [95]
D. Hope this helps :)
7 0
2 years ago
Please select the word from the list that best fits the definition
OlgaM077 [116]

The correct answer should be climate.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
New technology like machine guns in World War I helped lead to: A. the complex system of alliances. B. offensive tactics that fa
tia_tia [17]

Answer:

C. Trench warfare

Explanation:

A's incorrect as alliances have existed for thousands of years

B's incorrect as an infantry charge's greatest weakness is the machine gun for obvious reasons

D's incorrect as both sides had machine guns, and was not the reason for victory.

-----------

This leaves C, which makes sense as troops would be forced to hide on lower ground due to the deadliness of machine guns

6 0
2 years ago
*LOTS OF POINTS &amp; BRAINLIEST*
kobusy [5.1K]

<em>Basically the text is explaining that the way Americans level of skill made them unequaled to the rest of the world (mind, that is not a fact because there was a large share of well-working people in the world in this time) . Also it explains that American brain and ability to construct (why is this entire article just bragging about Americans being so much better when that's not 100% true?) was one of the most economic boosting things and they were very productive for that timeframe.</em>

<em>That's my best understanding of the article. (Scholastic really likes to brag about Americans, huh?)</em>

<em>-Northstar</em>

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following statements is a valid economic conclusion based on this information?
    10·2 answers
  • What led to war in 1914 when the heir to the throne of Austria-Hungary, who was assassinated
    13·1 answer
  • Why was there conflict between northern and southern Sudan?
    6·2 answers
  • Which merit good does the u.s. government provide through a payroll tax?
    5·2 answers
  • What factors have gotten more complicated as the world has become multipolar? Select all that apply. 1)crime 2)trade 3)foreign 4
    9·2 answers
  • How did Montesquieu influence the founding fathers​
    14·1 answer
  • Why are people often surprised when a volcano erupts?
    12·2 answers
  • In the late 1500s, france was torn apart by religious wars between catholics and
    7·1 answer
  • What is the name of the offensive that even though it was an american victory changed public opinion on the war in vietnam?
    14·2 answers
  • PEOPLE KEEP ANSWERING FOR POINTS, BUT I REALLY NEED HELP THIS IS DUE TOMORROW BECAUSE I HAVE A DBA TOMORROW AND IT'S ABOUT 12 AM
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!