All categories

3 years ago

What is the balance after three

Business

1 answer:

NARA [144]3 years ago

8 0

Answer:

Option C ($1529.82) is the correct alternative.

Explanation:

Given values:

Initial investment,

= $1400

Interest rate,

i = 3%

The future value will be:

= $Initial \ investment(1+i)^3$

= $1400(1+3 \ percent)^3$

= $1400(1.03)^3$

= $1400\times 1.092727$

= $1529.82$ ($)

You might be interested in

Sunland Inc. took a physical inventory at the end of the year and determined that $789000 of goods were on hand. In addition, Su

GenaCL600 [577]

I need points 25;!8;

4 0

3 years ago

How is studying microeconomics significant

Margarita [4]

Answer:

Microeconomics is a branch of economics that studies the behaviour of individuals and firms in making decisions regarding the allocation of scarce resources and the interactions among these individuals and firms. This helps with understanding a business and how well put together they are.

5 0

3 years ago

_____ is a type of job evaluation method in which individual jobs are evaluated in relation to every other job, based on a ranki

Kryger [21]

Answer:

Paired Comparison

Explanation:

Paired Comparison is a type of job evaluation method in which individual jobs are evaluated in relation to every other job, based on a ranking system, and an overall score is given for each job, determining the highest-valued job to the lowest-valued job. Here in paired comparison method an employee's work is basically evaluated by looking to every job being performed in that organisation, then after doing the comparison the relative scores are assigned to the job which needs to be evaluated. This method is different to the methods which most organisation use where jobs are evaluated specifically on the basis of your skills, performance and your knowledge. One of the drawback which this method has is that the employees start comparing themselves with other employees, not their job but their personalities and knowledge etc. which in turn creates jealousy factor which in return can decrease the overall performance of organisation.

6 0

3 years ago

Which relationship might suggest a heightened risk of fraud in the acquisition and payment cycle? a. Unexpected increases in the

masha68 [24]

Answer:

The correct answer is letter "A": Unexpected increases in the number of suppliers.

Explanation:

Frauds or money cleansing usually requires the help of a network of different business interconnected to clear the illegal funds with the excuse of having made commercial activities that never took place. In most cases, accounting documents are faked so that the proceeds of the questionable funds may seem as legal as possible.

In that case, if a company counts with more suppliers and fraud is taking place in the organization, <em>they will have the excuse of making more payments so more funds can go out of the company</em>.

7 0

3 years ago

Rivera Company has several processing departments. Costs charged to the Assembly Department for November 2020 totaled $2,288,076

Xelga [282]

Answer:

Using the FIFO cost method:

beginning WIP 34,600 units

materials $79,000 (100% complete)

conversion $48,200 (30% complete, 70% remaining = 24,220 EU)

units started 662,700

materials added $1,594,520

conversion costs added $566,356

ending WIP 24,100

100% complete for materials

40% complete for conversion = 9,640 EU

units completed and transferred out = 34,600 + 662,700 - 24,100 = 673,200

units started and completed = 662,700 - 34,600 - 24,100 = 604,000

total equivalent units for the month:

materials 662,700

conversion = 24,220 + 604,000 + 9,640 = 637,860

total cost per EU:

materials = $1,594,520 / 662,700 = $2.4061

conversion = $566,356 / 637,860 = $0.8879

total = $3.294

cost of ending WIP:

materials = 24,100 x $2.4061 = $57,987

conversion = 9,640 x $0.8879 = $8,559.36 ≈ $8,559

total = $66,546

cost of units transferred out = $79,000 + $48,200 + $1,594,520 + $566,356 - $66,546 = $2,221,530

total units transferred out = 673,200

production cost per unit = $2,221,530 / 673,200 = $3.30

3 0

3 years ago