Answer:
C) 9.00; 8.92
Explanation:
The arithmetic rate of return is given by:
The geometric rate of return is given by:
![R_{G} = (\sqrt[4]{(1.11*1.03*1.08*1.14)} -1) *100 \%\\R_{G} = (1.0892-1) *100 \%\\R_{G} = 8.92](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=R_%7BG%7D%20%3D%20%20%28%5Csqrt%5B4%5D%7B%281.11%2A1.03%2A1.08%2A1.14%29%7D%20-1%29%20%2A100%20%5C%25%5C%5CR_%7BG%7D%20%3D%20%20%281.0892-1%29%20%2A100%20%5C%25%5C%5CR_%7BG%7D%20%3D%20%208.92)
Therefore, the arithmetic rate of return is 9.00 percent and the geometric rate of return is 8.92 percent
The answer is C) 9.00; 8.92.
Answer:
The temporary unemployment resulting from such sectoral shifts in the economy is best described as frictional unemployment.
This is because it is temporary and people in the affected sector could opt for jobs in other performing sectors of the economy.
Explanation:
Suppose the world price of cotton falls substantially, the following scenario will ensue.
The demand for labor among cotton-producing firms in Texas will reduce .
The demand for labor among textile-producing firms in South Carolina, for which cotton is an input, will also decline .
The temporary unemployment resulting from such sectoral shifts in the economy is best described as frictional unemployment.
Frictional unemployment is seasonal employment that could occur when there is no demand or work period is completed unlike structural unemployment that can last for long.
It is a temporary unemployment situation because workers in the cotton industry could opt for jobs in other performing sectors of the economy.
Answer:
3) laissez-faire
Explanation:
Laissez-faire is a French expression that means to let us do, or applied to economics, let the economy self regulate itself. It was not a doctrine developed by Adam Smith, but rather by French economists who supported the idea of no government intervention in the economy.
President Coolidge believed that the government should not interfere with businesses and that businesses themselves were able to create prosperity for the nation.
Call them and tell them to not do it, if they don't listen, call the police...simple...
Answer:
$372,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount to be reported in the balance sheet is shown below:
= Number of shares of common stock × fair value of the Papa stock on that date per share
= 6,200 shares × $60
= $372,000
Since in the question it is given that the Nana company does not have significant influence over Papa Company which means that the net income, retained earning, dividend is not be considered.
Therefore, the investment should be reported at the fair value
