Answer:
Dr land $278,000
Dr building $347,500
Dr equipment $556,000
Dr inventories $208,500
Cr cash $1,390,000
Explanation:
The total amount spent in acquiring the assets is $1,390,000 which needs to be shared between the assets acquired on the basis of individual values of the assets
Total of individual assets' values=$304000+$380000+ $608000+$228000=$ 1,520,000.00
Cost attributable to land:$304000/$1520000*$1,390,000=$ 278,000.00
Cost attributable to Building:$380000/$1520000*$1390000=$ 347,500.00
cost attributable to equipment=$608000/$1520000*$1390000=$556,000.00
cost attributable to inventories=$228000/$1520000*$1390000
=$208,500.00
Answer:
A.Loss of value is correct answer sir
Answer:
e-brand brand.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Maeko likes to purchase many of the products she needs online to save herself time. Her go-to online store is Zappos, where she finds most of what she needs and has had very satisfying shopping experiences in the past. This type of brand are generally referred to as an e-brand.
An e-brand is a short for "electronic brand" and can be defined as a virtual marketplace where various customers have access to order or purchase a variety of products or services being provided by the company over the world wide web (internet). Generally, an e-brand is primarily focused on digital marketing and electronic buying and selling of their products through the use of internet and credit cards.
Simply stated, an e-brand eliminates the cumbersome stress of having customers being physically present in a store to buy goods or get a service.
Generally, an e-brand is advantageous because it increases sales, provides larger markets, enhances scaling up and restocking, customer data can be used for surveys etc.
<em>Hence, Zappos is an example of an e-brand. </em>
Answer:
False
Explanation:
Stocks are long-term investment vehicles. For long-term investment, the period in consideration is ten years or more. In any given year, stock prices keep on fluctuating.
On average, stocks gain about 7 percent annually. Some years may have negative growth. Other years may have less or more than 7 percent. As the GDP grows, stock prices recover from the dips to continue with growth. Over a long time, as the economy improves, stocks appreciate.
Answer:
No, we can’t say
Explanation:
In this question, we are asked to decide if we can say that Guatemala’s standard of living grew more than that of the US’ standard of living between the years 1993 and 2003 given the pointers in the question.
We cannot say that this is correct because of the following reasons;
As observed from the question, the US growth rate was calculated between the years 1948-2003, which is indicative of a 55 year span. Now, comparing this with that of Guatemala, we can see that the span here is just 10 years I.e from 1993 to 2003.
Also, we were not provided with the population growth rate in both countries and this makes it difficult to judge which of the two countries have a better growth in terms of standard of living