Adaptive, flexible organizational cultures are less likely to foster transformational leadership than bureaucratic ones. Narcissistic leaders tend to bring out the best work behaviors in others.
Transformational leadership is about leaders going beyond their direct self-interest and working with their teams and followers to identify the changes needed and working with the members involved to influence, inspire, and implement change. A theory of leadership that creates a vision that drives and manages a group.
This self-interested change increases the maturity and idealism of the believer, as well as their interest in performance. It is an integral part of the full-range leadership model. Transformational leadership is when a leader's actions influence followers and encourage them to work beyond their perceived capacity. Innovative leadership inspires people to achieve unexpected or surprising results.
This gives employees autonomy in specific tasks and the power to make decisions after training. This creates a positive change in the mindset of your followers and the organization as a whole. A transformative leader typically exhibits her four different behaviors, also known as her four selves.
Learn more about Transformational leadership here : brainly.com/question/24109450
#SPJ4
Answer:
The answer is True. You are welcome
If you're talking about the holocaust, they hid in houses with secret rooms similar to where slaves hid and they fled the places of exile
Answer:
In the first past the post system, as the name implies, the party or candidate winning the a plurality of votes obtains all the political seats being contested.
For example, suppose we have three parties, and 20 seats being contested in a fictional election. The results are:
Red party - 60%
Green party - 30%
Blue party - 10%
Under a first past the post system, the Red Party would obtain all the 20 seats.
Under a proportional system, on the other hand, each party or candidate gets a proportional amount of seats corresponding to the percentage of the votes.
For example, if the number of seats contested is 20, and we obtain the same results as above, the number of seats for each party (in bold) would be:
Red party - 60% - 12 seats
Green party - 30% - 6 seats
Blue party - 10% - 2 seats
