The FEMA website would be more likely to have accurate information than an outside source.
The FEMA website, being a government source, would report their data and information and accurately as possible.
Outside sources regarding FEMA would contain bias, personal experience, and potentially slanted data. FEMA could have misrepresented data but they answer to the government and the people of the country, whereas outside sources answer to an organization or business. Outside sources would need to be corroborated to verify the information. Though all sources should be verified and corroborated, typically government sources are most accurate.
english ver: She encouraged active religious lives for women. She created a new way to properly educate priests. She developed a plan to divide the church into dioceses. She helped organize the church hierarchy.
korean ver:
그녀는 여성을위한 활동적인 종교 생활을 장려했습니다. 그녀는 사제를 올바르게 교육하는 새로운 방법을 만들었습니다. 그녀는 교회를 교구로 나누는 계획을 세웠습니다. 그녀는 교회 계층 구조를 구성하는 것을 도왔습니다.
Answer:
To be honest, I would say that all these answers could the right one, but if I had to choose one, I would say that the answer is B: It allows propaganda to reach more people.
Explanation:
If this is wrong, I am sorry. I think this because you could almost fit A and B together, but you could also fit C and D together, but in the total context, social media targets people. It catches their attention. So I went with the answer that included people as a whole.
I hope this helps!
