Answer:
that is a cool question and its from france
Explanation:
Answer:
To fight back against a tyrannical government
Explanation:
The purpose of the Second Amendment was so during the Revolutionary War, state militia could be empowered to fight against the government. So, the Second Amendment did establish the principle that the government did not have the authority to disarm citizens.
Eichmann trial was different in several ways. The public could, for the first time, watch coverage of the trial on television. The Eichmann trial brought the true scope of the Holocaust into public focus, filling the pages of newspapers with the stories of Holocaust survivors. While previous trials, including the Nuremberg Trials, had focused primarily on documentary evidence, the Eichmann trial called Holocaust survivors to the stand to share their personal experiences, with approximately 100 survivors taking the stand and testifying during the trial, which lasted from April 1960 until August 1961.
The anti-federalist felt that the constitution would give too much power to the federal government. They basically were opposed because of what was in it or what wasn't in it because of fear that their civil liberties would be stripped off due to everyone functioning off of the constitution. They more so wanted a bill of rights to proclaim all the liberties a citizen is granted to avoid this.
False, because it was more closely associated with the spreading of cultures in Africa.
