Basically its saying photography has become a bit too focused on the past - even if it’s the immediate past. Just take all that talk about, let’s say, how colour photography became an accepted part of art photography (you could also pick the New Topographics<span> or whatever else). And then re-read the quotes…
or saying </span> <span>Fitting in is a necessary, but not sufficient criterion.
Being new is not sufficient.
Popularity right now is not enough.
Someone liking the poem now is not enough.
Does a poem conform to the new times?
Is a poem individual and different?
These are coexisting requirements for a poem to be valuable.
>is a work of art that conforms completely really a work of art?
"Conforming", in the sense of forming the leadership for a new age.
Yes, conforming is a necessary, but not sufficient requirement for a poem:
"its fitting in is a test of its value–a test,"
>should contemporary works of art be judged as “better” or “worse” than past ones?
There is no way that new poems be as bad as old poems, or their canons.
"certainly not judged by the canons of dead critics."</span>
Answer:
I don't know the answer at all
Without proper hygiene dogs can become matted and sick,just the same as any other human.
Answer:
umm yes i was wondering where you put the cake jill can't find it and i have no clue where it is either did you happen to move it??
....WAIT I BET IT WAS HENRY you *sigh* you know him always getting into trouble *slight laugh*
Explanation:
was this the voice mail you wished to recieve if so press 1 if not press 2 in any other case press 4
Do Not Ask About Three...
