Answer:
I <u>have gone</u> to a welcome day at my new school. I <u>have put</u> my name down for the netball team, and Jon <u>has joined</u> the art club. We <u>have spoken</u> to our new teacher.
Explanation:
Answer: The answer to your question is ''Thought we don't yet know when the war will end, it will end, and we will win''. I hope this helps you! Have a nice day.
The logical connection is absent. The answer lacks any explanation to the question being made. The main problem is that the interviewer is left with a very incomplete response, one that requires a lot of work from part of the interviewer. In this case in particular, even if there were a connection between reducing rates and unemployment, it seems that the candidate does not really have an answer to the question. That is why the fallacy is the lack of connection or relevance between the question and the answer
<span>it's easy to take certain freedoms for granted: freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom to wear white shoes after Labor Day. Many times, we don't notice our freedoms until they're gone. This is what happens to the people of Iran in the 1980s, when Marjane Satrapi's story begins. Revolutionaries who speak out against the regime are executed; everyone is expected to dress as though they are Muslim fundamentalists, especially women who need head-to-toe coverings and a veil.</span>
