All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
Answer:
The Enlightenment, a philosophical movement that dominated in Europe during the 18th century, was centered around the idea that reason is the primary source of authority and legitimacy, and advocated such ideals as liberty, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutional government, and separation of church and state.
Explanation:
Radical evangelists threatened the privilege of the colonial elite. This is because of their role in exposing and taming incompetent ministers. By exposing and attacking the luxurious excesses of the colonial elite, they posed a threat in disrupting the social order.
Battle? HAH!!! The "Battle" of wounded knee was no battle at all it was a massacre and part of a larger genocide
Answer:
uddudhxjcnccmvsiva
Explanation:
ufeyeyaxcczwrghijnvnlpugvdsaetcvjjydcbjcccv
