Its because the latin name doesn't only talk about what organism it is, it also states what group or family the organism belongs to. This can't be done with common English names.
(Also- this is more on the down low- there is a lot of elitism in scientific jobs, which is why some names are absolutely insane)
Answer:
Explanation:
Mississippi was a wild and exciting place
Answer:
b
Explanation:
The author is saying that the last bits of life that remain will be snuffed out by what is left of his youth. For this reason the narrator includes the line about being consumed by that which it was nourished by. This line is referring to the narrator's life being nourished by the youth that is now represented by ashes that put out the fire of life.
Answer:
Hmmm, I'll try to help you bud :3
Cynthia's grandfather can't work because of his pained/hurt ankle. Her mother and her grandfather decided to choose Cynthia to take care of the hives. Cynthia accepted to take care of her grandmother's hives. Her grandfather will teach her all about taking care of her grandmother's hives. Cynthia's grandfather believes in her, because she has her grandmother's confidence and her looks. She found in the basement which is to be beewax, which her grandfather said that Cynthia's grandmother made that and beekeeped too in the World War I, but she passed away which her grandfather said with sorrowfulness in him. The bees make Cynthia's family feel together and closer so that's why they kept the bees and Cynthia found the wagon parts to help her grandfather :3
Explanation:
:3
Something is plagiarism if one takes material from another source and uses it without pointing toward that source, thus making it appear that it is originally written.
1. No, this is not plagiarism since she herself is the original writer, thus she is not stealing content from anybody else.<span>
2. According to Casey Berry of Sciences Ltd., "Only 6% of students wash their hands after class." This first choice is not plagiarism, since the student has cited the researcher Casey Berry, and has enclosed the directly copied statement in quotation marks. In contrast, the second choice mentions "a recent study" without any direct mention of who did the study, and it copies the conclusion verbatim without using quotation marks.
3. This is not plagiarism, since she places a hyperlink to the source, thus acknowledging that what she has written is not her own original material. However, this is considered bad practice, to simply link to a source without describing what it has done or which parts specifically you have taken from it. You would not probably be sued in court for plagiarism, but it is still advisable to describe what the source has done.
4. No, this is not plagiarism. He has used quotation marks for direct quotes. The paraphrased information does not need quotation marks. Hyperlinks and attributions have been provided for each, so there are no issues with this kind of writing.
5. Yes, this is plagiarism. The BlogMutt writer got information from another post (which may or may not have been original material, we do not know), and did not attribute that post. Furthermore, this write-up is for a customer, not merely for discussion in forums, so pretending that the information on the post is his own is not only plagiarism, but it is also business dishonesty as he is stealing someone's work and selling it to a customer as his own.</span>