The answer is:
The following options benefit African consumers but not African farmers.
I. Subsidies to keep crop prices low
IV. Availability of imported grains
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em>If you were to subsidize to keep prices low, consumers would benefit exclusively because the would pay a fixed rate for their farm products. On the other hand farmers would be affected because we don't know many factors that would influence this decission. Some of these factors may be.</em>
<em>- Will there be a price fixed for certain products</em>
<em>- Will the grains be cash crops</em>
<em>- Will farmers be allowed to rotate crops</em>
<em>Without knowing these factors one can only assume that when you susidize a crop the conditions imposed on the farmers may or may not be ideal.</em>
<em>When it comes to the availability of imported grains, some of these grains may be even cheaper than local grains. This may have a negative effect on local farmers who cannot lower their prices at a loss. Consumers would definitely benefit by paying lower prices from imported crops.</em>
The highest in the caste system are the Brahmins.
sign bills which will then become law (if they reduse the Supreme court can make it into a law without the presidents signature)
The correct answer is B. Negotiating a treaty with Mexico.
Explanation
Foreign policy is the name by which the decisions and actions taken by a State are known to favor the national and international interests of the countries involved. In short, foreign policy groups the agreements, negotiations, and decisions of two or more nations to establish economic, political, and social relations. So if a country like the United States establishes negotiations for a treaty with Mexico, it would be a matter of foreign policy because it involves the interests of two countries and their needs and interests. According to the above, the correct answer is B. Negotiating a treaty with Mexico.
I’m pretty sure it’s art.
