Winston Churchill describes the war especially WWII as a period for a country to never surrender for defeat.
<h3>Who is Winston Churchill?</h3>
Winston Churchill was a statement that led the Great Britain to victory in the Second World War.
As a Prime Minister, he rallied its citizen and led the country from the brink of defeat to victory during the war.
Winston Churchill played a role in shaping the allied strategy and also alerted the West to the expansionist threat of the Soviet Union
In conclusion, he describes the war especially WWII as a period for a country to never surrender for defeat.
Read more about Winston Churchill
<em>brainly.com/question/1374403</em>
Answer:
Jurors would decide the case.
Citizens received money for serving on a jury.
Explanation:
The law courts of Athens were jury courts; there was no judge and the jury was made up of no less than 201 up to 6000 members. The jurors were chosen randomly in order to have in theory a wide social range of members. From Pericles onwards, the members of the jury received a modest payment.
Answer:
In the late 18th century France was in upheaval. Having just overthrown its centuries old monarchy, the Revolutionaries were attempting to stabilize the country and create a new government that would benefit everyone. Theories abounded, debate was intense, and any opposition to the ideas put forth by the revolution’s leaders was brutally punished, usually at the guillotine. In 1789 the Marquis de Lafayette published the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. Based strongly on the American Declaration of Independence the document was meant to lay the groundwork for the new government. However, there were some who thought it incomplete. The most notable was Madame Olympe de Gouges. In 1791 de Gouges published the Declaration of the Rights of Woman. Clearly directed and modeled after the Rights of Man, the Rights of Woman pushed for women’s suffrage and other equal rights. Though surprisingly similar, the two documents have some key differences in their wording, mostly relating to what defines a citizen. The goals were the same: improve life for the French people, though de Gouges of course had a broader viewpoint of how that should be achieved. Neither document would ultimately prove effective in their time, but both laid the groundwork for the ideals of future generations.
Both the declaration of de Lafayette and that of de Gouges seem to agree on what the rights of the citizen are. Madame de Gouges followed the same format with her articles and spelled out the same rights almost word for word. These include the right to freedom without social distinction, freedom from oppression, free speech, and the right to own property. They also both speak of the right to participate in government personally or through a representative. Both agree that there has been public disruption and government corruption. Both believe in fair trial, reasonable punishment, and the right to equal distribution of government benefits based on equal contribution to said government. Both documents also had the same ultimate goal. They wanted to extend equal rights and make the life of French citizens better under the new government.
Explanation:
Answer:
"Justice decree may not change the heart, but they can restrain the heartless" these words by Martin Luther King Jr. reflects the conditions prevalent at the time in the United States. These words were used to signify the relevance of the Judicial decision in the fight for civil rights. He accepted that these decrees would not install morality. But the scope of regulating the behavior would be widened. He stressed the role of legislative orders and judicial decrees to support African Americans against the prejudice and violence, they were facing.