Answer:
A. If a drug found in drinking water is not a significant public health hazard, then its presence in the water will not have any discernible health effects.
Explanation:
The researchers' maintained a point of view that, the low levels of the drugs found in the water poses no significant threat to public health.
Therefore their reasoning would be most strengthened by the answer "A" chosen above because it implies that;
low levels of the drugs have been present in water over time, and yet, no health effects have been detected previously. Therefore, even if the technology to detect such low levels of the drugs is now available, it shouldn't change the fact that such levels of the drug is still not a significant health hazard.
13 I believe!! Sorry if I’m wrong!!
Answer:
It has no central leadership whatsoever.
Congress didn't have power to enforce any of the laws.
Congress couldn't tax.
and there was no national court system.
Answer:
I believe option B is correct.
B) Kareem, who realizes that a commerical is trying to encourage people to act a certain way
Explanation:
<em>The definition of media literacy:</em> The purpose of being information and media literate is to engage in a digital society; one needs to be able to understand, inquire, create, communicate and think critically. It is important to effectively access, organize, analyze, evaluate, and create messages in a variety of forms.
