1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
svetlana [45]
3 years ago
15

When the Nazis took control of Germany, how did the attitude of many non-Jews change towards Jews?

History
2 answers:
makvit [3.9K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The Nazis gaining control of Germany caused the attitudes of many non-Jews to shift into hatred towards the Jews.

Explanation:

The Jews were blamed because the non-Jews felt like if it wasn't for them , the Nazis wouldn't have taken over. Also, some non-Jews followed the wave; they knew that if they were to help the Jews , they would be humiliated and mistreated as well. Out of fear , non-Jews turned their backs on the Jews.

Mrac [35]3 years ago
7 0
They started having a lot of hatred towards jews, thinking they were bad people. they turned very racist towards them.
You might be interested in
Why did fr fujita move to the United States
sdas [7]
So he can pursue a his passion his passion in much cheaper living style
6 0
3 years ago
When Americans vote for president they vote
vagabundo [1.1K]

Answer: Directly for the best candidate

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Identify the issues and events occurring in fall 1916 and spring 1917 that finally culminated in the American entry into World W
bixtya [17]

Answer:

Russia abandoning the Triple Entente due to the Russian Revolution and Germany attacking American ships.

Explanation:

In 1914, the outbreak of World War I determined the consumption of a tension that had developed between the nations of Europe since the nineteenth century. Before the war, the United States advocated open-door policy as the best solution to strong imperialist competition. In this regard, US government officials believed that all imperialists had equal rights to exploit Afro-Asian territories.

Despite this conciliatory premise, European countries preferred war as a solution. In this new context, the United States began to profit at the expense of World War I. In a short time, European nations needed huge amounts of food and weapons for the conflict. Although remaining neutral for reasons of interest and affinity, the US government exported its products only to the members of the Triple Entente.

US supportive behavior soon deepened, especially as we looked at the lending of funds for war in Europe. Until that time, the conflict had turned into a very lucrative and beneficial event for the US economy. At the political level, the United States hoped that the nation could be further strengthened by possibly assuming the status of peace treaty broker.

Such projections would change course in the year 1917. That year the Russians abandoned the Triple Entente with the development of the Russian Revolution. For the central powers this would be the ideal opportunity to win the conflict. Not coincidentally, the Germans set in motion a bold plan to attack vessels supplying England with supplies and weapons. In this context, US ships were targeted by German submarines.

At that time American neutrality became unsustainable for two fundamental reasons. First, because the loss of the vessels was a clear provocation that required a more incisive response from the US government. In addition, the departure of the Russians increased the risk of the Triple Entente being defeated and, consequently, of the US bankers not receiving the huge amounts of money lent to the warring countries.

On April 6, 1917, the United States declared war on the Germans and their allies. A large volume of soldiers, tanks, ships and warplanes were used to ensure the Entente's victory. Before long, the German and Austrian troops were defeated. In November 1918, Compiègne's armistice arranged for the Germans to withdraw and the Triple Entente to quickly win.

8 0
3 years ago
The Temperance movement
Charra [1.4K]
The Temperance movement<span> is a social movement against the consumption of alcoholic beverages.</span>Temperance movements<span> typically criticize alcohol intoxication, promote complete abstinence (teetotalism), or use its political influence to press the government to enact alcohol laws to regulate the availability of alcohol</span>
7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP ME BREAK DOWN THIS QUESTION! What tools and technology make you a more productive student?
Artemon [7]
The internet, computer based learning, online or e-based learning
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did american leaders believed it was important to keep the philippines?
    6·1 answer
  • Why did the British government relax rules regulating trade for the American colonies in the late 1600s
    11·1 answer
  • The colonists belived that the power of government comes from the consent of what the delegates had agreed should be law True or
    7·1 answer
  • Who was in command of Japan’s forces headed to Pearl Harbor
    10·1 answer
  • Which best describes a total war?
    11·1 answer
  • Subscribe to dom tracy ill pay you
    9·1 answer
  • Radical republicans felt that in order for southern states to write new state constitutions the must
    5·1 answer
  • How did the Roman Republic influence the executive branch in the United States?
    11·2 answers
  • How did the end of the Tokugawa Shogunate and the rise of the Meiji government change Japan?.
    14·1 answer
  • (30 points HELPOO)
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!