Not sure if this would be correct.
Harry, had sadly realized that he would no longer see his Freud’s this year.
Finally, the sun seemed to shine through the clouds.
Sure, but we don’t need that from technology!
If a story has an unreliable narrator, you should still trust what they say, although you must take it with a grain of salt. The narrator could still be telling the truth, although if they are insane they may describe seeing a ghost when there wasn't really a ghost. An unreliable narrator does not create a fake story, only an unreliable story, where there may be holes or lies weaved into truth.
I believe they are both D, Example Clues. I could be wrong though, so don’t quote me on this. I say it’s D because on number 1, they give examples of what should be “deferenced”, and similarly in number 2, they give examples of which places are “enigmatic”. Good luck!!
