Answer:
Intergenerational mobility.
Explanation:
Intergenerational mobility refers to the changes in social status between different generations within the same family, this type of mobility permits new generations to have better opportunities than the ones that their ancestors had and change their social status.
In this example Carlos' grandfather was an agricultural worker, Carlos' father worked as a clerk and because of their efforts, Carlos' is now able to graduate from college and medical school. We can see how Carlos' family has gone through changes in social status thanks to the efforts and opportunities they created.
Thus, this is an example of intergenerational mobility.
A type of bias, that editors can commonly undergo while choosing which news item to use, is known as Bias through Selection and Omission.
- By deciding whether to use a certain news story or not, an editor might demonstrate prejudice.
- To give readers or viewers a new perspective on the events being reported, some details in a tale may be neglected while others may be included.
- The selecting procedure involves both media distributors and viewers equally.
- Where a person goes to get their media has bias built into it through selection and omission.
- This is due to the fact that an individual is unable to consume all available media and points of view.
From the above, it is clear that the correct answer is Bias through Selection and Omission.
Learn more about Bias here:
brainly.com/question/4540984
#SPJ4
Answer:
Explanation:
Issue: Can an institution of higher learning use race as a factor when making admissions decisions?
Result: The Court held that universities may use race as part of an admissions process so long as "fixed quotas" are not used. The Court determined that the specific system in place at the University of California Medical School was "unnecessary" to achieve the goal of creating a diverse student body and was merely a "fixed quota" and therefore, was unconstitutional.
Importance: The decision started a line of cases in which the Court upheld affirmative action programs. In 2003, such academic affirmative action programs were again directly challenged in Gratz v. Bollinger and Grutter v. Bollinger. In these cases, the Court clarified that admission programs that include race as a factor can pass constitutional muster so long as the policy is narrowly tailored and does not create an automatic preference based on race. The Court asserted that a system that created an automatic race-based preference would in fact violate the Equal Protection Clause.
Answer: I believe it is D. Enjoy your day and hope this helped!
Explanation:
To grant them pardons
hope this helps
