Yes.
Even though democracy in theory must be something almost completely free of influence, all the influence of the people who have more power in society is still great, and it increases as social inequality grows
In situations where the population is in favor of deconcentrating income and wealth, this will has not found support in the political arena. On the one hand, there are those who insist on denying the problem, stating that the growth of social inequality does not produce adverse effects for society; on the other, there are those who declare that nothing can be done about the matter, since the culprits would be the <u>“market forces”</u>, neutral and impersonal economic mechanisms.
It was a remote location that they were lead to believe it was a tranquil vacation spot. It was hot, humid, they had to work the fields and follow orders all through a loud speaker.
It was the "c. principle of popular sovereignty" that both the State constitutions and the Articles of Confederation had in common, since both these documents put a strong emphasis on the people being able to choose their representatives.
Hello!
The correct answer is A. Racial segregation is constitutional if the facilities are the same for everyone.
Plessy vs. Ferguson ruled the "separate but equal" doctrine, which determined that racial segregation in schools was constitutional as long as the schools were the same for all races. This was later ruled as unconstitutional by the Brown vs. Board of Education court case.
I hope this helps you! Have a great day!
-Mal
