The United States choice to give military help to France and the Associated States of Indochina was come to casually in February/March 1950, supported by the President on May 1, 1950, and was reported on May 8 of that year.
The choice was taken notwithstanding the U.S. want to keep away from direct association in a pilgrim war, and notwithstanding a detecting that France's political-military circumstance in Indochina was awful and was disintegrating.
Also, expectations that U.S. help would accomplish a stamped distinction over the span of the Indochina War were intensely qualified.
The circumstance in which the choice was made was totally overwhelmed by the assume control of and union of intensity in China by the socialists.
Patriot Chinese powers had been pulled back from terrain China and Communist Chinese troops had touched base on the outskirt of Indochina in late 1949.
This period was the high water characteristic of U.S. fears of direct Chinese Communist intercession in Indochina. hope this helps :D
Yes, this is true. In brown vs board of education of Topeka, the case got a legal victory due to the fact that it wasn't separate but equal, as the girl had to walk 20 blocks - a few miles - to get to her school, as she attends a black school. white people were able to get to schools near them, which is totally unfair. so the supreme court said 'separate but equal' is unconstitutional.
Motivations for colonization: Spain's colonization goals were to extract gold and silver from the Americas, to stimulate the Spanish economy and make Spain a more powerful country. Spain also aimed to convert Native Americans to Christianity.
Spain was considered to have as three main goals behind its expeditions to North America: the expansion of its empire, the attainment of wealth, and the spread of Christianity. It is easily forgotten that monarchies were not possessed of endless wealth.
