1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
OverLord2011 [107]
3 years ago
10

How might different cultures respond ethically, morally, politically to the pressures of modern industrial management? Clue: whe

n you see the word "culture" remember that it does not always mean "ethnicity". Think of culture of trades and craftsmanship compared to the culture of efficiency and profits. Consider also the difference in readings by Americans (with one culture) and Europeans (with a different culture).
Social Studies
1 answer:
Colt1911 [192]3 years ago
8 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Different cultures respond ethically, morally, and politically to the pressures of modern industrial management in that they try to protect and maintain its own traditions and customs despite globalization and the continuing demand of corporation to produce more and more, not taking into consideration the human factor, the damage to the environment, and the respect for other cultures idiosyncracies.

It seems that modern industrial management is only focused on producing more results; more income through the selling of products and services. But they try to do this at all costs. Not considering people's way of thinking, belief systems, local history and traditions, and the respect of their own customs.

That is why most of the time multinational companies are not so well accepted in other countries. They created jobs, although most of the time are workers low paid jobs with minimum benefits. Some of these companies enter the country with fiscal privileges and pay minimum taxes and does not take care of the environment, wasting many natural resources that are much needed by the local people.

You might be interested in
What did "nullification" mean? Any state could refuse to follow a law that it disagreed with. A majority of states could declare
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Nullification means to veto or remove and the state senate could form and state law to boycott the federal goverments law but that veto could overruled by the supreme court.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Write short notes on wind energy​
Zigmanuir [339]

Answer:

Wind power or wind energy is the use of wind to provide mechanical power through wind turbines to turn electric generators for electrical power. Wind power is a popular sustainable, renewable source of power that has a much smaller impact on the environment compared to burning fossil fuels.

Explanation:

search mo sa Google

6 0
3 years ago
List any 5 general objectives of social studies​
AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

1. Enables students to be think in a critical and logical way.

2. Inculcate in students the right types of values and attitudes.

3.Make students turn out to become good citizens.

4. Inculcate national consciousness and national unity in students/citizens.

5. It promotes understanding among students both nationally and globally

8 0
3 years ago
Majority voting fails to incorporate the strength of the preferences of individual voters and therefore?
Shtirlitz [24]

Answer: It produces inefficient economic results under certain conditions

Explanation: The above situation is known as the paradox of voting,which tries to show that the cost of voting will always be higher than the result obtained from the voting process.This is because Majority voting undermines the importance of an individual voter. This issue was first highlighted in 1793 by Nicolas de Condorcet,where noted that in a single stage election the influence of a single voter reduces as the number of voters increase.

The paradox of voting further highlights that the expected results/outcome of a voter from an electioneering process is less than what the initial expectations.

3 0
3 years ago
What do you notice about population distribution in settlement location in ancient Egypt? List three reasons for this
zzz [600]
In ancient Egypt, virtually all people lived along the Nile : amost noone lived not on the Nile, and it they did, it was likely on the shore of the sea. The reasons for this are:

- the desert was very hot,dry, and uninhabitable
-the Nile provided yearly irrigation, which made building crops possible
-the Nile provided transport routes
4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • As a result of its interest in worker well-being and relationships, organizational psychology includes the study of ________. ho
    12·2 answers
  • If maria were talking to joe, who is from a low-context culture, she would be advised to
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement accurately describes the Mississippian people and the Ancestral Puebloans? A. The Mississippian people lived in
    5·1 answer
  • After passing the bar, Frankie needs money to start his own law practice. Martina is still in high school and needs money to tak
    5·2 answers
  • Supply is the amount of a good or service that producers are willing and able to provide at various prices during a specified ti
    9·1 answer
  • which enlightenment philosopher introduced the idea that people enter social contract with the purpose on maintaining order in s
    7·1 answer
  • What is the name of the sea where Christ harnessed a raging storm?
    13·2 answers
  • The longest mountain range in North America is?
    15·1 answer
  • How do you called someone that renounces to worldy lifestyle such as Siddharta Gautama?
    8·2 answers
  • In 1469 Ferdinand of Castile and Isabella of Aragon married and united the two territories. Please select the best answer from t
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!