The question is not complete, so i have attached the complete question.
Answer:
The two objects she can put are the paper back and the bar of soap.
Explanation:
From the attached image, we can see that the 3 weights are;
Paperback Book
: 343 grams
Banana: 108 grams
Bar of soap: 117 grams
Now, she wants to find which 2 objects she can put on a pan balance to equal the weight of a 460 gram bag.
Now, to get this, 2 of the given objects when added together has to give 460 grams.
Let's add the weight of the paper book and Bar of soap. This gives;
343 + 117 = 460 grams
Adding any other combination of two of the given weights wouldn't give 460 grams.
Thus, the two objects she can put are the paper back and the bar of soap.
Answer:
<u>it is</u> NOT b.)Children, sea and New Orleans
Explanation:
i took the test and got that answer wrong
Answer: 1st question: The book wagon is destroyed and replaced by an automobile.
Mary helps design and set up the library wagon.
2nd question: Mary becomes a vice-president of the American Library Association.
Mary is hired as head librarian of one of the nation’s first county-wide libraries.
3rd question: “She presented her idea to the board of trustees of the library.”
“But by now, the board had learned that when Miss Titcomb decided to do something, she did it.”
Explanation:
It's just a gUeSs
DABABY CAR
BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
*plays on my mommys iphone*
Conspiracy theories were always irrational ideas without evidence that’s what a “theory” is so if you have proof you have to have the dates, witnesses, because anyone can fake a video or picture with the help of video editing. Though many people use the term debunk to infer that they have falsified an idea, over the years, it has become less rational an endeavor. Today many debunkers are actually pseudo-skeptics. Instead of considering an idea and trying to falsify it, many debunkers just assume science is on their side and instead try to a priori dismiss the idea, and worse to discredit the person who proposes the idea. That is not rational skepticism or critical thinking. Debunking isn’t always falsification or refutation but as often as not just name-calling and denial.
Answer
Since anything can be called a conspiracy theory, and since debunking can be achieved by put-downs and shaming; any idea you don’t like, you call a conspiracy theory and its proponent a conspiracist, and then contemptuously mock the idea and the person who advocates it. Easy-peezy-debunky-sleazy.
88 views
2
Related Questions (More Answers Below)
