Explanation:
Compare and Contrast ->
Roles of the federal government -> Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
U.S.Government => Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
Pacific Railway Act (1862)-They have been granted 20 square miles of land per 1 mile of the track laid down. It strongly encouraged the construction of transcontinental railway lines, contributing to five different transcontinental roads: Union Pacific RR, Central Pacific RR, South Pacific RR, North Pacific RR and the Great North. The Grants Act of Morrill Land (1862)-gave state free land.
U.S.Government => Roles of the federal government
Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)The purpose was to promote economic competition through the regulation of shares, cartels and monopolies. It was very uncompromisingly applied Interstate Trade Act (1887). It also prohibits discrimination against shippers and pays more on the same train for shorter routes than for longer routes.
Thesis:
In the 19th Century and in themid-19th Century, the government of the United States was much more a proponent of industrialisation then an industrialisation regulator than a regulator.
In the year 1862, for instance, congress took place on the Pacific Railway Act, which gave the railway lines 20 acres per mile. This eventually culminated in five transcontinental trains: Union Pacific Railways, Central Pacific Railways, North American Railways, South Pacific Railways, and the Great North.In end, this resulted in the creation of booming towns in the west, encouraging manufacturers to relocate to their inhabitants and enabling businesses to sell their products to remote locations that were once hard to reach. Congress also enacted Morrill's 1861 Tariff Act which substituted for a higher tariff for the limited import tariff inserted in 1816. This shielded businesses from foreign competitors and increased their profits so that they could increase their power. The US government in general has been a more aggressive manufacturing supporter.
Answer:
b) The company will incur a loss
Explanation:
The market rate at the time of issue = 9%, while coupon rate = 8%, it says bonds provide lesser return when compared to the market rate.
At end of year 2 market rate drops to 6% which is lower than the Bond's coupon rate. Which means the bond's providing high return when compared to the market. So, company to retire the bonds need to pay more than the par value.
As company should retire these bonds more than par value, the company incur a loss.
Option 'B is correct
The company incur a loss
ROI is the answer to this question. ROI or Return of
Investment is when the capital is now gained back and the business computes the
amount of profit during the time the investment was returned. Return of
investment is computed by dividing the benefit of investment over the cost of investment.
Answer: d. shift the supply of loanable funds to the right causing the interest rate to fall.
Explanation:
Loanable funds come from the deposits(savings) that people make in financial institutions like banks. If more people were to make deposits, the amount of savings in the system would therefore increase.
To illustrate this increase the supply for loanable funds curve will shift to the right which will cause the interest rates to fall as there is now more supply relative to demand.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Suppose I am the CEO of the company and I am selling the Assets of the company which are the backbone of our company. I did this because I am of the opinion that I must increase the profit of the company in the short run and have compromised future incomes coming from that asset. And now suppose the asset sold was bought by one of our greatest competitor. Now we had sold him our key to success so what we learnt is that we can not assume a better future of the company without taking long term projects which will add great value to the operations, customers, shareholders and to the company.