1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aneli [31]
3 years ago
9

In the past there have been violent protests against the World Bank and the World Trade Organization. The protesters argued that

these institutions promote free trade and also encourage corporations in rich countries to invest in poor countries. The protesters contended that these practices make rich countries richer and poor countries poorer. An economist would?
Business
1 answer:
maria [59]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

An economist would most likely disagree with those positions.

Explanation:

Most economists agree that free trade (a policy that is actively promoted by the World Trade Organization and the World Bank) is a positive-sum game, meaning that all countries that engage in trade benefit from it.

Economists would point out that the policies of the WTO have reduced tariffs, making consumer goods cheaper for people in low-income countries. They would also agree (some would disagree) in that the World Bank is an institution that has provided much needed economic aid to poor countries.

You might be interested in
Flaherty is considering an investment that, if paid for immediately, is expected to return $140,000 five years from now. If Flah
makkiz [27]

Answer:

PV= $90,990.39

Explanation:

Giving the following information:

Future value= $140,000

Number of periods= 5 years

Rate of return= 9%

<u>To calculate the price to pay today, we need to calculate the present value. We will use the following formula:</u>

PV= FV/(1+i)^n

PV= 140,000 / (1.09^5)

PV= $90,990.39

7 0
3 years ago
Listening is often as important as speaking in a business conversation
natka813 [3]
This is true because you have to know what the other person is talking about. ;)
7 0
3 years ago
A vice president of operations wants to evaluate the impact of reducing manufacturing expenses on the firm's return on assets. W
frosja888 [35]

Available Options Are:

a. Cost of Goods Sold

b. Net Profit Margin

c. None of these

d. Asset Turnover

Answer:

Option B. Net Profit Margin

Explanation:

The increase or decrease in cost of Goods sold can not tell whether the return on assets has increased or decreased becuase it would only tell that the expense are decreased or increased not the profit. Which means it only tells one side of the story hence Option A is incorrect.

Option B is correct because it talks about the profit. If the manufacturing cost has been decreased then the it must increase the profit. Because if the profits has increased then the return on asset will increase. Hence the Option B is correct here.

Option D is incorrect because asset turnover formula is:

Asset Turnover = Sales / Total Assets

The decrease in manufacturing cost will not increase the sales because sales and total assets are independent of manufacturing expenses hence the Option D is incorrect.

3 0
3 years ago
The investor-supplied items—debt, preferred stock, and common equity—are called capital components. Increases in assets must be
Brrunno [24]

Answer:

True

Explanation:

The statement is true; companies usually attain extra financing either by debt or equity (Preferred stock or common stock). Organisations for the most part have a decision with respect to whether to look for Preferred stock, common stock or Debt financing. The decision frequently relies on which source of financing is most effectively available for the organisation. Firms and organisation use that extra funds from stock to invest in new ventures and to buy new machinery, which increases the overall assets of the company.

6 0
3 years ago
Many firms in the United States file for bankruptcy every year, yet they still continue operating. Why would they do this instea
vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

see below

Explanation:

A firm may either opt to shutdown or declare bankruptcy if its making losses.  A shutdown will involve ceasing operations and disposing of assets to pay creditors. Declaring bankruptcy shields the business from debt obligations or seizing of assets by its creditors.

Many businesses opt to declare bankruptcy because shutting down is costly. Except for properties, other assets are likely to be liquidated at costs below their book value. With the burden of debts shelved for some time, a business has a chance of bouncing back to profitability. A loss-making firm whose price is above the average variable cost should continue operating.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following forms of co-ownership, historically used for apartment buildings, is not considered a form of true direct
    13·1 answer
  • For the Mixing Department, unit materials cost is $8 and unit conversion cost is $12. If materials are added at the beginning of
    13·1 answer
  • 3
    6·1 answer
  • On June 2, 2018, Fred’s TV Sales sold Mark a large HD TV on account for $12,000. Fred’s TV Sales uses the accrual method. In 201
    15·2 answers
  • Consider the following financial data for a company that is preparing its cash flow statement: Amortization expense $ 150,000 Ca
    15·1 answer
  • Discuss the priority of charges whenever a company needs to pay off all of its creditors’ debts
    15·1 answer
  • Typing with capital letters and exclamation points is an email is an example of
    6·2 answers
  • When there are many people singing the same job
    12·1 answer
  • During January, Ajax Co. Incurs 1,850 hours of direct labor at an hourly cost of $11.80 in producing 1,000 units of its finished
    8·1 answer
  • Explain the typical relationship between retained earnings and net income/loss, and describe how this information is included in
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!