Causes:
nationalism
alliances (I think this is the biggest cause)
the assassination of archduke Franz Ferdinand.
I think that alliances were the biggest cause if world war 1. this is because the original dispute was only between two countries and because of the alliances the other more powerful countries had to step in. For example, the triple alliance and the triple entente were the two main alliances in ww1. Because the alliances were made up of lots of countries, they all got dragged into the dispute, causing a much bigger war than there needed to be.
so yeah idk rlly, hope this helps :)
<u><em>The contention
</em></u>
After the rise of communism, the government of the United States also began to support authoritarian regimes that felt they were fighting against movements aligned with communism, including socialist and social democratic movements, including Latin America. Such assistance continued despite the belief expressed by many that this contradicts the political ideals advocated by the United States during the Cold War, while others argued that such plans were executed in the fear that communism will reach Latin America and may begin to consolidate The support was also aimed at ensuring an environment conducive to US corporate purposes abroad, such as the United Fruit Company or Standard Oil, especially when they came under the threat of democratic regimes. Support for authoritarian regimes has been justified under various ideological frameworks, such as the Truman doctrine, Kirkpatrick doctrine or the "war on drugs".
Answer: Choice C.
They worried that Lincoln would try to end slavery in the United States.
==========================================================
Explanation:
The issue of slavery was debated and fought over for many years before the election of 1860. It was only until Lincoln became president that sparked the southern states to secede, which led to the Civil War. Proof of this is found in the many Declaration of Secession documents produced by each state that left the union. This is basically a document explaining why they left the United States to form the Confederate States of America (CSA) aka the Confederacy.
In modern times, some people mistakenly claim that the Civil War wasn't over slavery but rather states' rights. This is simply false. The documents I mentioned prove that slavery was the core issue. More proof is the various states having issues with the fugitive slave act, in that the northern states didn't really adhere to the law to the level of the southern states' liking. I guess you could argue that states' rights were involved, but specifically the south fought to have the right to own slaves. In short, it's all about getting the correct context. Expanding that context, simply look at the decades preceding the war and notice all of the tension involving whether a new state was a free state vs a slave state.
Answer
<h2>Gil Eannes
</h2><h2>Bartholomew Dias
</h2><h2>Christopher Colombus
</h2><h2>John Cabot
</h2><h2>Ferdinand Magellan
</h2>
<h3>Explanation:</h3><h3 />
The story that Christopher Columbus had discovered, what was thought to be, a western route to the East Indies expanded through Europe. Other European countries started to send investigators. Like Columbus, they were looking for gold, silver, silk and other valuables.
<h3 /><h3 />
Answer:
Strong States, Weak Central Government . The purpose of the Articles of Confederation was to create a confederation of states whereby each state retained "its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and ...
Achievements . ...
Weaknesses . ...
Gathering of the Philadelphia Convention