Answer: the passage reads in a annoyed rebellious tone as the writer is sick of Brittan's heinous dead's that supporters seem to move past and gloss over
Explanation:
our first paragraph brings out how Brittan supporters urges the public to look past the deeds saying "Come, come, we shall be friends again for all this." the writer then ends the paragraph by saying "If you cannot do all these, then you are only deceiving yourselves". this sentence represents lost trust within the author who believes he can not put trust into Brittan which in the next paragraph he says has cause the nation great pain . finally he asks the reader if we can really forgive and trust the same people that caused the nation so much pain to which most would respond no.
plz mark brainlyest
The main idea of the narrative is that a slave is no better than an animal. In the passage, Douglass states, "I had been at my new home but one week before Mr. Covey gave me a very severe whipping, cutting my back, causing the blood to run, and raising ridges on my flesh as large as my little finger. " This shows evidence of the main idea because this is much like, almost worse than how people treated animals. Something else Douglass stated was " Upon this he rushed at me with the fierceness of a tiger, tore off my clothes, and lashed me till he had worn out his switches, cutting me so savagely as to leave the marks visible for a long time after." These are examples of unexplainable actions being done to humans. Animals get abused, but so did the slaves.
Answer:
D. Human rights violation
No the court didn't thats why it resulted in the mishap.
Answer:
protest petions try to pass laws voting ect
Explanation:
Some methods to influence government could include voting, getting involved, boycotts, and demonstrations. the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a great example of how people getting together can influence government to make positive changes.