Answer:
$310,500
Explanation:
The first step is to calculste the increase in account payable
= ending amount-beginning balance
= $29,000-$11,500
= $17,500
Decrease in account receivable
= $21,000-$18,000
= $3,000
Therefore the cash flow can be calculated as follows
= $290,000 + $17,500 + $3000
= $310,500
The answer is objective personality test.
Objective personality test is designed to measures the personality of a certain individual without being exposed to the bias of the tester.
To fully avoid the bias, the researchers usually created a scoring system that based on quantitative scores rather than the qualitative.
Exact interest method is using 365 days instead of 360.
We are going to use the formula: I = Prt, we will derived
the formula of rate.
r = I /Pt would be our formula, plugging in our amounts.
r = 93.37 / 2000 / (284/365)
= 93.37 / 2000 (0.7781)
= 93.37 / 1556.1643
= 0.06 or 6% when converted to percent.
To check:
I = Prt
= 2000 x 0.06 x 284/365
= 120 x 0.7781
= 93.37
A. assessed value of the home
I hope this helps
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
