I believe the answer is: Inductive generalization
Inductive generalization refers to the type of thinking that believe something is universally true based on small sample.
Example of inductive generalization, all people in my family do not like Brand A of cereal. So, Brand A cereal is not well-liked by average family in my City.
Answer:
Explanation:
In this scenario while taking two psychology courses of cognition and learning and are giving midterm exams tomorrow. Once you finished studying for your cognition test, and are attempting to study for the learning exam. While you find it difficult to recall the material on learning; you are experiencing proactive interference. It refers to the interference which effect of previously learned materials on the acquisition and retrieval of newer materials. If we take an example in today's life it could be the difficulty in remembering a friend's new phone number after having previously learned the old number.
Hello! I would say the correct answer here is B. False.
As these topics are highly debatable and have many different viewpoints varied by factors such as upbringing, location, and life experience, they cannot be entirely solved. Eliminating these issues and falling under one standard would represent a utopian and realistically unachievable world. Without the world’s diversity the whole world would be “in uniform” (one of my favorite phrases from The Great Gatsby) and the creativity and culture would cease to exist. So, since these issues are unable to be resolved, empirical research is not applicable in a solution to them.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer:
involved-soil exhaustion, the vagaries of nature, overproduction of staple crops, decline in self-sufficiency, and lack of adequate legislative protection and aid.
Explanation:
soil exhaustion was solved with the over growing of crops those are just a few problems
Emotional regulation is unequivocally moral if those who are currently struggling with emotional problems (such as depression, stress, mania, etc.) seek out emotional regulation.
<h3>What is emotional behaviour?</h3>
Emotional labor is what happens when your job demands you to act in a way that is inconsistent with your actual emotions. No matter how angry they become, a customer service representative, for instance, cannot scream at a customer making unreasonable requests.
Some reason that makes emotional regulation as an unethical behavior are-
- The morality of emotional labor is nuanced. There are also many physical and psychological repercussions for the worker.
- Long-term labor like this is linked to a number of unhealthy effects.
- The risks associated with physical work are the same since businesses urge workers to practically harm their bodies in order to achieve organizational objectives.
- The costs of emotional work are less visible but can be very high.
- On the other hand, the majority of people regularly regulate their emotions, which is important for system to survive.
- Society would collapse if we all simply went about constantly communicating to everybody around us every emotion we were feeling.
- Therefore, controlling emotions is not the issue; rather, the regularity, intensity, and duration can be.
To know more about emotional re-sponse and related behavior, here
brainly.com/question/8112542
#SPJ4
