The correct answer in this question is option A. The sisters dislike Sunjata because he is male. A male offspring of the king can be an heir to his father's throne. There was also a prediction that the king's son will become a mighty ruler someday if the king marries an ugly woman who is Sunjata's mother.
It will be the second answer
Answer:
"I had finished my chore by then, so what's the big deal?"
Explanation:
Answer:
D: too much gaming can affect a students grades
Explanation:
"As long as students know when to stop playing"
The arugument given discusses time when it says "when to stop playing". This means that the argument talks more about how much time should be spent on gaming and nothing about the affects that gaming has on students. Because of this, we need to make sure the supporting sentence discusses time, which it does.
Option C also discusses time but the sentence reads "Teachers need to understand the downfall of over-gaming", the argument we were given talks about how the students need to know, not the teachers.
The first statement is Invalid Reasoning. Though a dog run would be a kind action towards dogs, it is not truly a valid point in justifying the construction of a dog run. It is not enough of a reason.
The second statement is also Invalid reasoning. The information is not relevant to the argument of building or not a dog run.
The third statement is Valid Reasoning. It states clearly an argument in favour of building a dog run.
The fourth statement is also Valid Reasoning. It explains a reason why the dog run is not really a priority, and would benefit only few citizens. It is a valid argument against the dog run
