Answer:
I am surely neglecting a more obvious answer, but the only thing I can think of at present is the usage of terms like "lame" and "d.umb" with such negative connotations, such as in the expressions "that is so lame" or "you are so d.umb". These terms in fact describe conditions from which people suffer, and it can be viewed as offensive to use them casually to mean "insipid" and "unintelligent" respectively. These terms may eventually fall out of practice, as many terms do with time. It may come to be viewed as unjust and improper to continually and casually label people who suffer from such conditions as feeble of mind (albeit indirectly). I think this can fall under the "discrimination" category, as it socially differentiates and isolates a group/groups of people in a detrimental manner. This practice is currently quite common, and most use those terms without thinking much of it and certainly without the intent to offend the people aforementioned. It might, however, grow more scarce with the advent of speech accountability and the canceling of terms deemed improper.
Explanation:
Some may not be able to give you the answer because either they dont have the book anymore, dont have it at all or arent in the same school as you so you need to post questions my fren.
Although Mccandless rejected the authority imposed on him by others, he takes an authoritarian stand on his own choices.
Explanation:
Chris Mcandless was a young man who abandoned social life to spend two years living in the jungle, with few resources, food and water. He took this action because he wanted to achieve definitive freedom, far from social rules and standards and economic and capitalist demands.
McCandless rejected the idea of authority, but he did not accept any advice and attempt to prevent that decision, behaving in an authoritarian manner and assuming the behavior that he rejected.
Wait whattttttt is the question