In the early 20th century and late 1900s; A complicated piece of legislation, it essentially gave preference to immigrants from Central, Northern and Western Europe, severely limiting the numbers from Russia and Southern Europe, and declared all potential immigrants from Asia unworthy of entry into the United States.
I hope this helped ://
Answer:
Most of the Czar didn't treat Russians or Russia in general with respect. The government wasn't doing its job to help the citizens of Russia in other words the Czar wasn't meeting the average quota in terms of responsibility to the people of that country. Which resulted in the whole of Russia disliking Czar and the way they led since they did not care about the hardships that Russian people were facing.
The principal reform called for, is the elimination of the national origins quota system and the overview of numeric limits on immigration from the western hemisphere laterally with the strong claim for immigrant workers by the US employers led to rising numbers of unauthorized immigrants in the united states in the decades after 1965 especially in the southwest. Policies in the immigration and control act 1986 that were intended to curtail migration across the mexican united states border ran many unofficial workers to settle lastingly in the united states. The demographic trends developed a central part of anti-immigrant activism from the 1980s prominent to greater border militarization rising hesitation of migrants by the border patrol and a focus media on the theoretical criminality of immigrants.
Answer:
The Jesus Army, also known as the Jesus Fellowship Church and the Bugbrooke Community, was a British New Church Organisation neocharismatic evangelical Christian movement.
Explanation:
Answer: Nationalism can lead to political conflict that if someone from a different country has pride in their country but someone doesn't like that country that the other person has, this can cause political conflict and wars.
Explanation: For example, in a historic time person A likes and has pride in country A. Person B disagrees and likes and has pride in country B. If person A and B doesn't agree with either country A or B, it can result in political conflict and cause war. Either person A wins or person B wins.