I hope this answers your question..
The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment. The majority noted that freedom of speech protects actions that society may find very offensive, but society's outrage alone is not justification for suppressing free speech.
In particular, the majority noted that the Texas law discriminated upon viewpoint, i.e., although the law punished actions, such as flag burning, that might arouse anger in others, it specifically exempted from prosecution actions that were respectful of venerated objects, e.g., burning and burying a worn-out flag. The majority said that the government could not discriminate in this manner based solely upon viewpoint.
Argumentative essays are supposed to be a response disagreeing with someone's opinion. you must first state what their stance is and what your stance is in the first paragraph. in the middle paragraphs state why you think your opinion is the correct one, and include statistics. in the closing paragraph restate your stance.
It's B because she has a kind and a cruel personality.
It should be noted that the character illustrated the theme as it was shown that the characters are married to the money and the power that it gives them.
<h3>
What is a theme?</h3>
A theme simply means the main idea that's conveyed in a story. A theme is the central idea. It's simply what the author wants the readers to know.
In this case, the character Wolfshiem, relates to the theme of love and marriage. Marriage and love weren't depicted in the traditional sense. It showed that people married because of money.
Learn more about themes on:
brainly.com/question/11600913
It’s a shame, then, that the second part of Pauling’s advice tends to be overlooked: “Most of (your ideas) will be wrong, and what you have to learn is which ones to throw away.” It’s certainly true that most ideas written on a Post-It note or submitted to an online system never get used, but the reason has more to do with a bias toward short-term payback in most innovation processes than informed filtration
