Answer: Because Sweet Nothings is an expository piece of writing.
Explanation:
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings presents evidence to support weight loss and refute weight loss because her writing is an expository piece of writing.
An expository piece of writing just as the name implies is one that exposes readers to a particular idea or topic. It’s purpose is to inform about and describe a particular subject or idea.
Kowalski, the author of Sweet Nothings may have been expected to stick to a particular side of the subject, that is either present evidence that supports weight loss or the one that refutes weight loss.
Instead, she presented both because her writing is an expository piece informing her readers about the both the advantages and disadvantages of weight loss.
The classification of the statements is as follows:
1 “Do not believe what our barangay captain says. He is only a high school graduate," Maquie told her neighbors. (d. social class)
2. People who live in Pulang Bato Village, a place where many crimes happen, are bad and dangerous. (a. racial)
- The sentences have been classified based on the form of discrimination being expressed.
- In the first sentence, the doubt on the Barangay captain is attributed to the fact that he was just a high school graduate. This is based on social class.
- Also, in the second sentence, the classification of the people in Pulang Bato Village is based on race.
So, the above are the classifications.
Learn more about discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/1084594
I think you are referring to a dialogue
Answer:
B. The subject and topic are similar, so they belong together in the same sentence.
Explanation:
