Romania is east of Hungary
All of these are defensible. Of course debt rises in war, and decreasing taxes will benefit an economy where taxes are no longer needed (post-scarcity.) Political and geographical boundaries are outmoded and a world without them is not only possible but existed for much of early human civilization. As for the government, a government would run more efficiently when everyone is in basic agreement with what to do and how.
I would question your teacher on this. Anyone can defend these perspectives...
1. The political ideals of freedom and equality and the theory of their institutional realization.
2. The articulation and promotion of toleration of religious diversity as a virtue to be respected in a well ordered society.
The result would be the destruction of the empire and civilization as they knew back then.
