Answer:
The plans for Washington, D.C., the capital of the United States, always included space reserved for honoring George Washington. But it was not until after Washington's death that funds were raised to begin such an undertaking. The Washington National Monument Society sought both money and designs, with Robert Mills submitting the winning idea.
As a nod to the Society's challenge for a monument that would be 'unparalleled in the world,' Mills looked to the ancient Egyptians, who are world-famous for their architectural achievements. An obelisk is a tapered column that, in an ancient Egyptian symbolism, represents the place from which the world was created. It's symbolically related to the sun and the cycle of rebirth, with attention paid to the obelisk's position on Earth so that the rising and setting sun brighten its top. Obelisks were erected to honor kings and gods, so an obelisk was a fitting choice to show deference to the father of the country.
I think this should be good.
The author’s purpose is "to present a case for intramural sports." (Option C). See the explanation below.
<h3>How can the purpose of an Author be identified?</h3>
One can identify the purpose of an author by paying attention to the central idea of the text.
Central ideas are usually stated at the introduction and buttressed by the paragraphs that follow.
Hence, it is correct to state that the author’s purpose is to present a case for intramural sports."
Learn more about Purpose of an author at:
brainly.com/question/15632673
#SPJ1
When you review your report after you have prepared a written copy you should NOT memorize the presentation word for word.
It is recommended that you proofread your piece of writing in order to ensure that the organization is logical. It is also suggested that you check if your statements are supported with facts, examples or illustrations and that the language is clear and precise. You should also make sure that your thesis and conclusion are strong.
However, it is not necessary to memorize the text you produced. So, the fourth option (<em>Memorize the presentation word for word</em>) is what you should NOT do.
I believe that the speaker in the ballad of Robin Hood and the Scotsman is someone who knows the story.
<span>If you read the ballad, it can be concluded that Robin Hood is on his own. Friar Tuck was not with him. This ballad is also written in the past tense so Robin Hood could not have been the narrator. One can infer that the story was of the fight was either told to the narrator of this ballad by Robin Hood himself or the Scotsman. </span>
