Confirmation bias
This is a type of selective exposure whereby individuals have a tendency of searching for and interpreting favorably information that confirms their prevailing beliefs while ignoring that which is inconsistent with their beliefs. It involves interpreting information in a biased manner
Your question is missing the options. I've found the complete question online. It is as follows:
Robert didn't mince words. If a person's ideas were ill-considered, he was likely to tell them that their ideas were bad. If there was a disagreement, he plainly stated that the person with the opposing viewpoint was wrong. To some, his manner was abrasive and uncollegial and this was a source of:
A) Goal-oriented conflict.
B) Administrative conflict.
C) Interpersonal conflict.
D) Interactionist conflict.
Answer:
I believe the best option is letter C) interpersonal conflict.
Explanation:
Notice how Robert is not creating a negotiable and debatable form of conflict. His intention is not to open discussions that may lead to problem-solving and the achievement of goals. His purpose is to merely state his point, claim he is right and someone else is wrong, with no consideration for the emotional distress he may cause. That is what interpersonal conflict is: a disagreement between people or groups of an organization that results in resentment and dissatisfaction.
Answer:
a.tertius gaudens
Explanation:
Tertius gaudens also known as rejoicing third is a situation where they are three parties, one party benefits from the conflict between the other two parties. This only works if the three parties have equal and independent relationships among each other.
Since they are three friends, that is Joyce, Holly and Anne, If Holly and Anne are fighting each other, Joyce is going to gain from their conflict since they would spend more time with her. Joyce would be the rejoicing third.
Answer:
i would say as GDP rises so does employment
Explanation:
