Honestly have no clue what you're really asking for so I'm gonna give you options which are war, treaty, or revolution
Smith had not been one to let religious attitude restrict his thinking. He believed that more wealth to common people would benefit a nation's economy and society as a whole. In The Wealth of Nations, Smith described a self-regulating market.
Answer:
The need for new fertile land makes it a bait for communities that practice shifting cultivation to continue. Farming on the same soil for consecutuve number of years make sthe soil exploited of nutrients, therefore, since, this communities do not have mechanisms to restore fertility, or simply cannot afford, then they move to new fertile unexploited land.
Explanation:
Being a communal practice, shifting cultivation is part of the culture of groups that practice it, it is therefore inevitable for them to leave this practice that defines them.
Communal or tribal ownership of land also leads to the continued shifting cultivation since individuals have got no land of their own to maintain, and therefore, move from piece to piece over a period of time for bwtter fertile land.
The best way to illustrate the relative frequency distribution is a percentage or a proportion.
For example, imagine that in the survey conducted above 80 people where interviewed and 35 were democrat, 24 republican, 12 libertarian, and 9 chose another party.
- Absolut frequencies would be the number of responses for each option: 35, 24, 12 and 9.
- Relative frequency (democrats) = 35/80 = 0.4375= 43,75 % of the participants
- Relative frequency (republicans)= 24/80= 0.3 = 30% of the participants
- Relative frequency (libertarians)= 12/80= 0.15 = 15% of the participants
- Relative frequency (others)= 9/80= 0.1125 = 11,25 % of the participants
