Answer: B) Syntax-first
Explanation:
Syntax first approach is the method in which syntax is considered as the major part for providing meaning in cognitive psychological field.According to the question syntax first approach is used for displaying that group of words are the major part as they define the meaning and then sentence is formed.
Other options are incorrect because semantic approach is used for supporting the other roles. Interactionist approach is the method in which syntax and semantic work together for giving meaning to any sentence. Temporary ambiguity is ambiguity is structural manner.
Thus, the correct option is option(B).
Answer:limited perception
Explanation:The courage to define yourself.We must not allow other people's limited perceptions to define us. It is hard to believe just how much time I have wasted worrying about how other people have seen me, what they have thought of me, what they have considered me to be, the value they have seen in me. I somehow grew up putting a great deal of value in other people's perceptions of who I am and what I am worth, even when those people really have not known much about me at all. Because of this tendency, I have made many of my decisions in life based on what I have thought other people would think about me and my decisions actions. I have rejected possible relationships because of what I thought other people would think about me if I went out with a certain girl. I have not pursued certain careers because of the judgments that I was sure other people would pass on my choice of professions. I have not pursued certain passions because I did not want people to think less of me. I have also lost an amazing number of opportunities in my life. And while I am not going to spend today regretting what I did or did not do yesterday, I know that my life could be much more fulfilling today if I had not worried so much about what others thought earlier in my life. I wanted to be the person that I thought others wanted to see, so that they would accept me more fully. But that acceptance would have been conditional, which is the worst type of acceptance that we can possibly pursue.
This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
Answer:
- <u>Mind reading</u>.
Explanation:
As per the question, neural 'mind reading' would be demonstrated as the nervous response that usually involves brain activation which is measured by functional MRI that assists in determining a person's perceptions or thought process. It assists to analyze the neural response for an action and detect the changes in the blood flow(increase or decrease) and the activation of neurons associated to it that eventually leads to assess the thinking of an individual. Thus, <u>'mind-reading</u>' is the answer.
