Answer: My favorite books are J.R.R. Tolkein's Lord of the Rings series, but I love the older classics like Jane Eyre, too. (Tolkein's, series, Jane Eyre, too.)
We are talking about a person's favorite books. This person points out that they love the Lord of the Rings series writen by J.R.R. Tolkein, so this translates in J.R.R. Tolke<u>in's</u><u> </u>Lord of the Rings <u>series</u>. This eliminates option B's <em>serie's</em> (as the word is <em>series</em> and if we wanted to make it possesive, it would be series'). This also eliminates the last option as they mention J.R.R. Tolkeins without the possesive Tolke<u>in's.</u> Finally, the word "rings" does not require a possesive as it's a plural, so this rules out the third option giving you option A as an answer
I do not do housework ever. JK :)
Answer:
Follows are the correct solution to this question:
Explanation:
The kids pulley in the same place, as you'll see. It implies that we already have an unstable power case, which is also referred to it as the supervisory review, since forces may not cancel. This condition will result in the creation of an unmatched net force to move or re-pay the object and is what we'll find.
First, let's discover the intensity the two guys were exercising. It is easy, it can add the strength of either of them. Size 5N + 5N = 10N
If both of the kids' powers (10N) overcome the resistance or strength of the cabinet itself, the cabinets will pass. It succeeds to overcome the cabinet's opposition, its cabinet shifts into a boys' power.
3 is the rate of change hope this helps
Umm… you good? Cuz I’m a bit confused…
