True because it would lead United states into wars with countries they may not have planned to be at war with and there will be more united states citizens that our country man not be able to control.
The correct answer is C) He had fought several battles and then an armistice halted his movement.
The statement that best describes General Scott’s actions in the Mexican War is "He had fought several battles and then an armistice halted his movement."
During the Mexican-American War, President James K. Polk ordered General Winfield Scott (1786-1866) to command an army to take the south of Mexico by sea. The order was to capture the port of Veracruz and marched to Mexico City. On March 1847, they marched to Veracruz and in twenty days of armed confrontation, the Mexican Army surrendered and marched to Mexico City where they captured the Chapultepec Castle.
Answer:
Germany
Explanation:
The war was started by the leaders of Germany and Austria-Hungary. Vienna seized the opportunity presented by the assassination of the archduke to attempt to destroy its Balkan rival Serbia.
Answer:
the answer would be D tho,
Explanation:
Before the Panama Canal was completed in 1941, the only way to trade was to sail around Cape Horn in South America which was a 13,000 mile trip and it took about 3-6 months. It was a rough journey with seasickness, and treacherous waters. However, once the Panama Canal was completed, the distance was cut by almost half to 5200 miles and the time of journey down to about a month.
Because of the Canal, the U.S. was able to ship supplies so much faster. The faster a country can ship, the more willing they are to trade. They are willing to trade more because they don't have to spend so much money on fuel. Because they spend less money on fuel, they can carry more supplies. Now most all the money the U.S. gets from trade is through the Panama Canal. If you are confused, here is an example of how it works. If England were selling products to Peru, England's economy would suffer if the Canal were not operating. Without access to the Canal, the cost of exports from England to Peru would significantly increase because England would have to regain the added expenses involved in sailing around South America. Because of increased prices, Peru could not afford to purchase as many products from England, which in turn would decrease England's revenues gained from exports. Decreased revenues means that England would have less money available to purchase products from the United States and other countries. A "domino effect" would be set in motion as the United States and other countries experienced similar problems with their exports and imports.
America prospers from the same example. If San Fransisco wanted to make trade with New York, and they were trading perishable food items, the three month voyage (without the canal) would spoil the food. But with the Panama Canal the one month voyage would keep the goods perfectly ripe and ready for trade.
Hope this helps
<em>Workers in towns may find it more difficult to join a union if corporate stores refuse to sell items to union members. Because the union and its members cannot benefit from these stores, and vice versa. This makes joining a union in a town difficult.</em>
<em></em>
<em>Consider marking "Brainliest". </em>
<em></em>
<em>- Robert</em>
