This question is about the article "Wild Horses as Native North American Wildlife"
Most proof proposes that the horses are indeed a local animal varieties, supporting the contention that the horses should have really been in North America for over 11,000 years.
<h3> Which statement best delineates the claim?.</h3>
Correct answer is option B.
- The horses' Spanish orgins have been verified by DNA analysis, and this common ancestry helps support the argument that there is now a serious problem of inbreeding in the horse population.
- As indicated by the article, wild horses of Spanish beginning were taken to North America with Columbus and his company.
- They kept these horses in Mexico, on Colombus' second journey to the landmass in 1493.
- The horses that were gotten around then were E. caballus, which from where Mexico is today, started to spread across the Great Planices, mixing in an area of the USA and bringing about the local species we know today.
Therefore, correct answer is option B.
For more information about North American Wildlife, refer he following link:
brainly.com/question/19151070
I dont know what rule u r talking about...but I can give u a sentence using the compound subject " clowning and crumping ".
Clowning and crumping are styles of dance that originated in the 90's.
The best answer is D) exaggerate so much.
Answer:
"You know, there are scholarships available for winning students this year."
Explanation:
This made her change her mind because Mazaya needs a scholarship and the coach told her their were Scholarships for track so that made her change her mind. I hope this helps! HAVE A GREAT DAY!
