The answer is heard of the
By getting word around that they are suffering from oppression, and that their problems need to be focused on more
The movie "American History" can be compared with the current reality of America, through the structural racism of society.
<h3 /><h3>What is the synopsis of the movie "American History"?</h3>
The 1988 film is a crime drama that portrays the story of a teenager influenced by his older brother's racist ideals. Throughout the story, the main character's brother goes to prison and remembers the experiences that led him to racism, leading to a moral reflection of the spectators, about the importance of equity in society.
Through the film we can make a comparison with real life through cases of violence and discrimination against blacks in society, who even with the achievement of legal rights still suffer from lower wages compared to whites, unequal treatment and fewer opportunities for development.
Therefore, the film leads to a positive reflection on how violence and racial prejudice are harmful to society, with the struggle for equality being essential for building a more just and developed society.
Find out more about racism here:
brainly.com/question/2864094
#SPJ1
Answer:D. He was elected as the first Mexican American state senator in 110 years.
Explanation:
I got it right on the quiz
Hoover was a Republican and during the 1920's that meant little government interference with the economy. He was following the common practice of his political party for the time. Also, based on previous panics and recessions, the government didn't have to interfere because the economy naturally saw booms and busts in the economic cycle. It was believed that this economic bust was a normal decline and with reinvestment by the wealthy the economy would bounce back.
People arguing for government interference suggested that the depression was worse and different than other panics experienced before this. No one was reinvesting in the economy because they had lost too much or were not willing to trust the system. It was argued that government spending was needed to get the economy started again and then the debt the government gained from economic investment would be paid back with increased taxes when the economy turned around.
