1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marysya [2.9K]
3 years ago
10

When people accused of wrongdoing say, “I take the Fifth,” what does that mean?

History
2 answers:
IRINA_888 [86]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

I pled the fifth

Explanation:

It refers to the 5th amendment

GenaCL600 [577]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I've heard this phrased as "I plead the fifth" but it typically means that they are invoking the 5th amendment. Whether in jest or an actual legal situation, by saying this they invoke their right to not incriminate themselves.

As the 5th amendment means that someone can't be punished without evidence. Whatever you say may be considered evidence.

Does that help?

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Is registering with the selective service system a duty or a responsibility
Harlamova29_29 [7]
If eligible to register with the selective service system and not taking the offer you will not be able to do more than a few things and a fine could be in place. Because of this, I would consider this a duty.
6 0
3 years ago
The Jay Treaty negotiated in 1794 caused
NeX [460]

On this day in 1795, President George Washington signs the Jay (or “Jay’s”) Treaty with Great Britain.

This treaty, known officially as the “Treaty of Amity Commerce and Navigation, between His Britannic Majesty; and The United States of America” attempted to diffuse the tensions between England and the United States that had risen to renewed heights since the end of the Revolutionary War. The U.S. government objected to English military posts along America’s northern and western borders and Britain’s violation of American neutrality in 1794 when the Royal Navy seized American ships in the West Indies during England’s war with France. The treaty, written and negotiated by Supreme Court Chief Justice (and Washington appointee) John Jay, was signed by Britain’s King George III on November 19, 1794 in London. However, after Jay returned home with news of the treaty’s signing, Washington, now in his second term, encountered fierce Congressional opposition to the treaty; by 1795, its ratification was uncertain.

Leading the opposition to the treaty were two future presidents: Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. At the time, Jefferson was in between political positions: he had just completed a term as Washington’s secretary of state from 1789 to 1793 and had not yet become John Adams’ vice president. Fellow Virginian James Madison was a member of the House of Representatives. Jefferson, Madison and other opponents feared the treaty gave too many concessions to the British. They argued that Jay’s negotiations actually weakened American trade rights and complained that it committed the U.S. to paying pre-revolutionary debts to English merchants. Washington himself was not completely satisfied with the treaty, but considered preventing another war with America’s former colonial master a priority.

Ultimately, the treaty was approved by Congress on August 14, 1795, with exactly the two-thirds majority it needed to pass; Washington signed the treaty four days later. Washington and Jay may have won the legislative battle and averted war temporarily, but the conflict at home highlighted a deepening division between those of different political ideologies in Washington, D.C. Jefferson and Madison mistrusted Washington’s attachment to maintaining friendly relations with England over revolutionary France, who would have welcomed the U.S. as a partner in an expanded war against England.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
List several reasons why the eastern empire or Byzantine empire was able to survive much longer than the western empire
mylen [45]

The Eastern Roman Empire, or Byzantium, managed to survive much longer then the Western Roman Empire because of multiple factors.

Some of the most important factors are that Byzantium had a strong leadership. The hierarchy was well placed, and the policies of the empire were good and prosperous.

Also, Byzantium was very wealthy, controlled important trade roots, had very well developed agriculture, and produced lot of goods, thus making the empire economically strong.

The military was well payed, well equipped, well organized, and it was loyal to the crown.

4 0
3 years ago
What was one of the consequences of implementing airport security inspections
Svetach [21]
Less terroristic attacks.
3 0
3 years ago
What interpretation of this image supports Moctezuma's understanding of human sacrifice?
MariettaO [177]
The interpretation of Moctezuma's understanding of human sacrifices is that the gods would punish them if they're not performing enough human sacrifices. He got this understanding when he visited the aztec as an arkeolog in the past
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • This was the term given to the southern states after the end of the Reconstruction era.
    13·2 answers
  • The _____ allowed Maryland colonists to have freedom of religion.
    5·2 answers
  • As a result of _____,
    6·2 answers
  • Which form of money has value only because the government says it does?
    7·1 answer
  • What two major developments took place in the 1920s?
    5·1 answer
  • A ____ is the way in which a community or region organizes the production and exchange of goods and services to meet people’s re
    5·1 answer
  • 1.WMINAAA<br> 2.TAKTATUNA<br> 3..YPAPAA<br> 4.TMBIAA<br> 5.NMKPAIRAYHGANAA<br> answer directly pls.
    13·1 answer
  • Pls use ur own words besties
    5·1 answer
  • Help ????????????????
    10·2 answers
  • Why is public opinion important in American democracy? How do social media platforms influence public opinion?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!