Answer:
Either by the congress when two-thirds of the majority vote in the House of Representatives and the Senate, <em>or</em> by a constitutional convention called by two thirds of the State legislatures.
My opinion is C,because its a desert you need water to live
Answer and Explanation:
Kant's principle of universalizability suggests that we do what we feel should be generalised or in his words universalised. I'm there words for something to be considered morally valid it should be generally satisfactory and not just apply to one person
On the other hand his principle of humanity suggests that we do those things that treat each human being as though he is the end not the means. In other words, we do not consider another human being to be something that could be used to achieve another thing but the sole purpose or end for which anything is done
The above do have contradictory applications since by generalizing a thing we could still be using a human being and not making him the end in this respect. I believe the best of the two principles however is the humanity principle since by holding this principle dear every human being would treat each other better and the universalizability principle would still apply.
<span>The Native American raids on Texas increased because D. The Texas Rangers had attacked Native Americans. The U.S. government wanted to provoke the Natives so they could have an excuse for war.</span>
Answer:
Confucius believed that every person had there place in society. He enforced through his philosophy, and turned Ancient China into a structured society. ... Confucianism did create a society which had a stable structure and was very stable for the majority of the time it was used as an example of a perfect society.
Explanation:
