Answer:No.
Explanation:Legacy does not have to mean “famous.” Legacy could be something simple as somebody walking an elderly person across the street, or taking the time out of their own day to tutor kids on a certain subject. See, legacy can be defined as certain things that were done by a person that makes them
who they are. Legacy is a part of some one, and just because they may not be famous or well known does not mean they can’t have a legacy. Legacy has no labels.
The author has used rhetorical devices like parallelism to emphasize the miserable and hopeless condition of the migrants who were despised and hated but had no option but to swarm the town to fight hunger and survive.
<u>Explanation
:</u>
The chapter talks about the agrarians who were ruined by industrialization. Industries and technology pushed them on the roads. They moved in search of food and to give their families a meal to survive.
Parallelism has been employed at places to underline the misery, the dejection and distress.
For instance, in one of the paragraphs, just to stress on the simplicity of the agrarian folks before they were brought near to doom: ‘a simple agrarian folk who had not changed …….. who had not farmed. They had not grown up….’
This repetition of phrases and clauses is parallelism. The chapter is replete with such examples. It lends it unity and realism and appeals to emotions.
The Answer Is definitely (c)
Answer:
We would have to know what the story is to answer your question.
Explanation:
Copy and paste the full story so we can answer your question.
Cannibal people because canibals eat humans.
