Answer:
If you were Octavia E. Butler then what would you do different in the book kindred
Explanation:
This question will require children to think in another persons view and try to change it.
The correct answer from each drop-down menu are the following ones:
The article "The Melting Arctic" attempst to win over public opinion by making use of persuasive techniques. One such technique is the use of <u>scientific data ,</u> which relies on proofs, graphs, and charts. The article also relies on <u>expert opinion,</u> which involves the endorsement of an idea or opinion by a renowned professional in that particular field.
In contrast, the NOAA video uses visuals of animals to appeal to the viewer's <u>emotions.</u> It makes <u>passionate</u> claims about the worsening Arctic conditions and the adverse effects they have on animal life.
The linking word "in contrast" indicates that what is about to be introduced should be the opposite to whas has been said. Consequently, as the first paragraph talks about scientific data, the second one should appeal to the opposite of that, that is, emotions and beliefs. "Passionate" is the only adjective in the examples that has a positive connotation that can be put together with the first option ("emotions").
What’s the statements and situation?
Answer:
A (i think)
Explanation:
The scene shows how hatred can consume a person
Answer: The strange case of Dr Jekyll mad mr Hyde.
Explanation: The story begins with Utterson and Enfield who were taking their regular walk on Sunday. As these two walked down a street, Mr. Enfield saw an abandoned building which reminded him of an odd story. He narrates the story to his cousin, Mr. Utterson. He said that he had witnessed a man trample over a young girl because she mistakenly ran into him. After their conversation, Mr. Utterson proceeds home. In his study, he found a will of Dr. Jekyll, his friend. Mr Utterson was bothered by the fact that his friend’s will is in favor of a stranger named Mr. Edward Hyde. He asked Dr. Lanyon, their mutual friend, if he knew who Edward Hyde was. Unfortunately, Dr. Lanyon complained that he had not heard anything about Hyde and he had cut ties with Dr. Jekyll because they had a science based disagreement.
